Step 1 · Prove · Prove · Proven purchase PT·EN
Higgsfield Refund Case · Visual Course

Proven purchase

Separate what the transaction record proves from what it cannot prove.

Primary source
Redacted dossier — “Reconciled purchase” section

What this source supports: Reconciles receipt, billing, and expanded invoice without exposing identifiers.

The simple layer stands alone; open the technical layer for limits and objections.
1

The big idea

By the end, you can
  • Identify the four purchase facts
  • Avoid confusing quantity and price
  • Keep only necessary data

Four facts are documented: 5,000 adjustable credits, payment on July 4, 2026, a total of US$199.75, and paid status. That proves the transaction. It does not yet prove which wallet funded later usage.

Think of it as… a bank deposit receipt confirms money arrived, but it does not list every later withdrawal. The analogy breaks because digital credits depend on the provider’s internal ledger.

Under the hood

The evidence converges: the PDF prints the quantity as 5,000 and the expanded invoice confirms Qty 5000. A US$235.00 subtotal minus 15% yields US$199.75. Real identifiers belong only in the official support channel.

2

Visual map

Item Quantity Payment Status
Read left to right: each stage limits what the next may claim.
PROVES Purchase and price DOES NOT PROVE Wallet consumed
The case becomes stronger when the evidence boundary stays visible.
5,000 credits
July 4, 2026
US$235.00
−15%
US$199.75
Paid
Receipt
Billing
Invoice
Reconciled
No IDs
Official channel
Proves

Purchase and price

Does not prove

Wallet consumed

3

In practice

This record turns the reasoning into verifiable fields without personal identifiers.

Structured case record 
{
  "credits": 5000,
  "paid_on": "2026-07-04",
  "paid_usd": 199.75,
  "status": "paid",
  "wallet_usage": "not_visible"
}

How to verify

Open ../../dossie-reembolso-higgsfield.md and inspect the reconciled-purchase table.

Worked example
1Record quantity, date, total, and status.
2Remove identifiers from teaching material.
3Mark ledger-dependent facts as “not proven.”
4

Try it

Commit before reveal

Does a paid receipt prove the purchased credits remain untouched?

No. It proves the purchase; the remaining lot requires a consumption ledger.
Commit before revealPurchase↻
Reveal answer5,000 credits for US$199.75.
Commit before revealReconciliation↻
Reveal answerTwo quantity representations both resolve to 5,000.
Commit before revealLimit↻
Reveal answerPayment does not reveal the source wallet for each use.
Active review

Answer both questions; the score updates automatically.

Which statement is directly supported?
Payment appears in reconciled sources; lot integrity requires the ledger.
Which datum stays out of this course?
The amount is necessary to the reasoning; the receipt number is an identifier for support only.

Sources and traceability

Sources and traceability
RESOURCES.md
Higgsfield Terms of Use
§ 9.3 · § 9.4
Brazilian Consumer Code
Official source · context, not automatic conclusion
Use what you learned to review the request and seek professional guidance if legal or banking consequences matter. Next, see why one displayed basket can hide two possible wallets.